IBN Lies Live

October 27, 2009

Foreign funded IBN Lies Live has a history of undermining native Indians. A section from their news program is provided here.

Take the polls that follow

The interplay of connections, by no means exhaustive that monopolise mass manufacturing falsehood is presented here.

Rogue Media Network

Interplay of IBN Lies Live, Editor Sagarika Ghose’s connections is provided here. It appears that family connections rather than merit propelled Sagarika Ghose to the editorship of IBN Lies Live.

And of course Rajdeep Sardesai family proudly funds christian fascist worldvision which under the cover of social service does serious jesus evangelism. More on world vision which is led by Congress party Rajya Sabha MP, Radhakant Nayak (christian with Hindu sounding name) here.

And we will see Rajdeep Sardesai with a straight face claiming his channel is unbiased and will talk about the propriety of dynasty politics. Touche! Joke is on us, those who watch manufactured deceit from IBN Lies Live!


BJP: Vasu Cut Down – Is Kamaraj Type Plan the Way Out?

October 24, 2009
BJP/RSS is showing poor understanding of how perceptions are formed. Perceptions are important in democratic polity. BJP
should know that it is operating in a hostile environment where its positive points will be under reported and its weaknesses
amplified.
Perceptions over a period of time shape credibilty and credibility is an important ingredient in electoral market place.
The way in which Vasu’s resignation was played out shows that either or both LKA/MB are making serious errors of judgement.
But for backing from LKA/MB, it seems unlikely that adhoc and arbitrary decisions’ll be continuously taken. RSS too cant wash
their hands off from these happenings as they unfold.
Despite Vasu’s mistakes, it is not untrue that the likes of Jaswant Singh undermined Vasu during her tenure. Vasu’s
accusations are a mere paraphrasing of what Arun Shourie highlighted in an even more damning terms – existence of double
standards. Vasu/Gen Khanduri might have failed to deliver. But so did Arun Jaitley(AJ)/Raj Nath Singh(RNS) in UP.
While failure in itself should not be a disqualification, as failures often result in learning key lessons, repeated failures
is a disqualification. From this perspective, Raj Nath Singh much more than Vasu/Khanduri should have been shown the door
first. The argument that RNS is anyway on the way out is specious.
Bleed an enemy by thousand cuts is something delivered on hostile elements. Not on oneself. Protracted bleeding that is being
manifest in BJP’s transition, reflects serious mistakes that BJP/RSS leadership is making.
When drastic changes to the organization are being carried out, it is better if it is done fast as a surgical strike. If
there is a bloodbath, so be it. Its better than protracted bleeding (factional shenanigans) that will impact BJP perception
in the minds of its prospective voters. A rapid strike also helps set the rules of the game – cut down factionalism. Events
if allowed to drift can impact credibility of Sangh.
One way to effect quick transition is through BJP’s own version of Kamaraj Plan. BJP can of course can call it “Vajpayee
Plan” or “Advani Plan”. More than semantics what is important is person/team arbitrating the plan execution should be
competent and perceived by most sections as genuinely neutral. People holding central party leadership positions, should be
asked to quit.
Let redeployments be representative, based primarily on capabilities/performance rather than solely on loyalties/Sangh
legacy. While importance of loyalty/trust cant be underplayed, deployments should be based primarily on potential for showing
positive results.
(This section making a pitch for re-susticating BJP is part of an extensive analysis that was done earlier post 2009 LS
Elections; addressing both strategic and tactical aspects)

BJP/RSS is showing poor understanding of how perceptions are formed, credibility built. Perceptions are important in democratic polity. BJP should know that it is operating in a hostile environment where its positive points will be under reported and its weaknesses amplified.

Perceptions over a period of time shape credibilty and credibility is a key ingredient in electoral market place.

The way in which Vasu’s resignation was played out shows that either or both LKA/MB are making serious errors of judgement.

But for backing from LKA/MB, it seems unlikely that adhoc and arbitrary decisions’ll be continuously taken. Sangh cant wash its hands off from the events as they unfold. It appears Mohan Bhagwat’s message on transition is being undermined.

Despite Vasu’s mistakes, it is not untrue that the likes of Jaswant Singh undermined Vasu during her tenure. Vasu’s accusations are a mere paraphrasing of what Arun Shourie highlighted in an even more damning terms – existence of double standards. Vasu/Gen Khanduri might have failed to deliver. But so did Arun Jaitley(AJ)/Raj Nath Singh(RNS) in UP.

While failure in itself should not be a disqualification, as failures often result in learning key lessons, repeated failures, is a disqualification. From this perspective, Raj Nath Singh much more than Vasu/Khanduri should have been asked to resign first.  The argument that RNS is anyway on the way out is specious. Buck rests at the top.

Bleed an enemy by thousand cuts is something delivered on hostile elements. Not on oneself. Protracted bleeding that is being manifest in BJP’s transition, and they reflect serious mistakes that BJP/RSS leadership appear to be making.

When drastic changes to the organization are being carried out, it is better if it is done fast as a surgical strike. If there is a bloodbath, so be it. Such a course is better than protracted bleeding (factional shenanigans) that will impact BJP perception in the minds of its prospective voter base. A rapid strike also helps set the rules of the game – cut down factionalism. Events if allowed to drift can impact credibility of Sangh.

One way to effect quick transition is through BJP’s own version of Kamaraj Plan. BJP can of course can call it “Vajpayee Plan” or “Advani Plan”. More than semantics what is important is person/team arbitrating the plan execution should be competent and perceived by most sections as genuinely neutral. People holding central party leadership positions, should be asked to quit.

Let redeployments be representative, based primarily on capabilities/performance rather than solely on loyalty/Sangh legacy. While importance of loyalty/trust cant be underplayed, deployments should be based primarily on potential for showing, sustaining positive results.

(This section making a pitch for re-susticating BJP is part of an extensive analysis that was done earlier post 2009 LS Elections; addressing both strategic and tactical aspects)

Tailpiece: Post this blogpost, Sarsangchalak of RSS, Shri MB openly alluded to serious nature of BJP’s problems. Contrary to inspired media leaks, central problem seems to lie with the BJP top brass.


Maharashtra Defeat: Lessons for BJP

October 22, 2009

BJP, if it has to get out of its morass of the past decade, will need following:

  1. Coherent definition of Ideology elements such as Hindutva, Big Ideas that will have resonance in minds of voters.
  2. Social Engineering to expand its voter base on social and economic criteria. Execution done by enabling the Organization machinary, effectively synergising with like minded organization/groups/opinion makers.
  3. Inspiring and credible leadership of a proven performer like Modi who can bring in the incremental votes (something that Advani 2009 could not achieve). Credibility of leadership is important. Image should match reality. (Sickular muck throwing if effectively countered on ground will help potential BJP voter mobilisation)

Above three conditions in conjunction are necessary. A two legged or a one legged seat is never stable.

A committed dharmic battle fought in the mindspace, resolutely over a period of time is the way to go. There should be a will to win backed by killer instinct (Krishna Neethi) to win. Perseverence will be the key. While the election campaign is culmination of the fight, the war to root out totalitarian dynastic evil congress I (islami-isai) is continuous and it should continue with full vigor.

(This section is from more extensive analysis that was done earlier post 2009 LS Elections)


Ram Punyani’s Clever By Half Cunningness in Muslim India

October 21, 2009

Rogue professor Ram Punyani is back with his Goebellsian lies and shibboleths fittingly this time in Muslim India

Punyani cites what he calls Hindu mal-treatment of women. Censors the fact that in native Hinduism alone feminine as divine is accepted and celebrated, so unlike islam. 

It is indeed laughable that Punyani’s vehicle for feminst stand is an islamic medium. In every sense Hindu women in India are better empowered than islamic women. 

Punyani pretends as if in islam, Talibs alone are anti-women. Typical of leftist deceit, he censors islam’s position on women: quran/mohummad institutionalized inferior status of women. Quran, Verse 4:34 howsoever muslims spin it, is quite categorical on this count. Watch the video below for elaboration on quran’s position on status of woman – property of man, fit to be beaten up.

Native Indian beliefs are essentially non dogmatic. Manu Smriti hardly has the dogmatic perception Hindu’s mind unlike the position koran has in a common muslim’s. Punyani of course tries to do better than Don Quixote. He regurgates the nonsense on slavery of Shudras. He surely cant be ignorant of the historical fact that Shudras like Shivaji, Narendrabhai Modi, Sanghi have been in the fore front defending native Indians and their traditions. And the so called upper caste Hindus never have any problem being led by Shudra leaders like NaMo, Shivraj Chauhan. 

Contrast this with institutionalised tribal heirarchies and approval of tribal incompatibility as valid reason for divorce in islamic law – shariah. Islamic equality indeed! Far from equality, Inequality is institutionalised in islam. 

With their chosen red fundamentalist friends like Ram Punyani, muslim Indians dont need enemies. After working to undermine native Indians, their beliefs, their unity, muslim victimhood cries will be hollow, if their actions similar to the ones in Godhra, result in hostile native responses.  Muslim hypocritical cries will be rejected with the disdain with which native Indian Gujaratis have been rejecting them.

Some Gyaan for Ram Puniyani and fundoos of muslim India: 

  • Rashtriya Sevika Samiti is an autonomous organisation with a separate charter which includes inculcating leadership in women. Sangh does not micromanage it. 
  • Unlike muslims and communists, Sanghis worship Indian Nation as a Feminine Manifestation, Bharat Mata. 
  • Sangh Recently awarded Guruji Award to Ms Kom, India’s boxing champion. 

Smt Kom

Ms. Kom India’s Boxing Champion being Feted by Sangh’s Guruji Award


Arun Shourie at Harvard

October 20, 2009

arun_shourie_030210

Arun Shourie Shares His Take on India’s bogus secularism, leftist canards, NaMo’s performance & prospective role in BJP, MF Hussein’s islamist hypocrisy, corruption, pernicious influence of money in electoral politics.

Arun Shourie shares his take on India’s bogus secularism, leftist canards, NaMo’s performance & prospective role in BJP, MF Hussein’s islamist hypocrisy, corruption, pernicious influence of money in electoral politics.
Some key points:
1. Moderator seems a leftie, an Amartya Sen acolyte. Arun makes the leftie eat his words after leftie sites what he calls powerful example.
2. Makes pieces of leftist shibboleths by citing facts and reality. Blasts India’s perverted secularism, divisive politics.
3. Ascribes BJP’s organisation weakness for its election loss in 2004 and onwards.
4. Describes NaMo’s remarkable performance in Gujarat and how he  can electrify BJP’s moribund electoral organisation.
5. Says it is OK if communal minded muslims dont vote BJP. Alludes to BJP working on native consolidation.
Arun says much more. Listening to audio alone will provide
(Any blog volunteer should he be interested can prepare the transcript and shareon India’s bogus secularism, leftist canards, NaMo’s performance & prospective role in BJP, MF Hussein’s islamist hypocrisy, corruption, pernicious influence of money in electoral politics.

Key Points:

  1. Moderator seems a leftie, an Amartya Sen acolyte. Arun makes the leftie eat his words after leftie refers to what he calls powerful example. Leftie refers to Hindutva, but has trouble defining it.
  2. Makes pieces of leftist shibboleths by citing facts and reality. Blasts India’s perverted secularism, divisive politics.
  3. Ascribes BJP’s organisation weakness for its election loss in 2004 and onwards.
  4. Describes NaMo’s remarkable performance in Gujarat and how he  can electrify BJP’s moribund electoral organisation.
  5. Says it is OK if communal minded muslims dont vote BJP. Alludes to BJP working on native consolidation.

Arun says much more. Listening to audio alone will do justice to the perspectives he brings out. It is unfortunate that Indian journalism with men like Shourie in Mainstream, that took on corruption in the establishment has degraded to a state where deceits like Shekhar Gupta and NDTV-Barkha Dutt collude in the sly with corrupt Government.

SHORT TRANSCRIPT OF THE SESSION:

(Captured by Yossarin)

Long introduction by the master of ceremonies refers to Arun Shourie’s recent pieces critical of the state of affairs in the BJP, doesnt miss an opportunity to recall “Alice in Blunderland” wisecrack at Rajnath Singh.

First question is on soul searching by Arun Shourie.

Arun Shourie starts with attributing the confusion in the Party and the defeat of the Party feeding on each other.

Arun Shourie On Soul Searching

never a good time to do it in hierarchical organisations

Organization should be current not just an electoral machine

conduct of individuals must be exemplary

greater need for soul searching within RSS than in the BJP

decision making in all political parties has been reduced to a small privileged clique

small privileged cliques resist soul searching

Second question is on winning confidence of Indian Muslims

BJP should stand for true secularism

Individual should be the Unit of State Policy

Rejects Communal or Caste based Group Entitlements Policymaking

We should not give to a Communal group what we would deny to a Secular group

Shourie on Affirmative action and caste based reservations

Absurd levels of reservations with sub-castes within sub-castes

Points to absurd promotions in government to fill up quota vacancies

Disputes the label “backwardness” being applied to groups like Jats,Rajputs, Vokkaligas, Lingayats etc.. which are politically so “forward” they are able to force the hand of the State to be labelled backward. Political strength rather than social standing decides who is backward. Shourie refers to his work “Falling over Backwards”

Cant believe that a man like Manmohan Singh could have issued a directive from the Prime Minister’s Office to Nationalised Banks on maintaining records of loans given to Muslims

Asserts that in the long run BJP stands to gain by standing for True Secularism

Next question is on whether BJP should dilute its policies to gain Muslim Votes

believes that Muslims themselves will see credibility in BJP if it sticks by its beliefs and doesnt succumb to temptation of appeasement

If we can identify BPL for PDS why not for targetting socio-economic backwardness in Muslims

Next question is on need for Affirmative Action to address exclusions due to discrimination. Refers to study by Carla Hoff World Bank economist on Caste exclusion.

Shourie questions the wisdom of reinforcing Caste prejudices by asking for Caste to be identified in employment and other State services

Asserts the wrong lessons being inferred from this World Bank example

Questions the use of “criteria” that reinforce the prejudices in State Policy

Next question is on whether Caste neutral policies can deliver on Social Justice

points to notings by British census officers till 1930 on why caste should not be used an enumeration since it is “meaningless and fluid”

refers to an example of a Caste’s population dwindling from 800k to 100k between 2 Census cycles because a certain caste got elevated to a higher caste. Shows that ‘caste’ traditionally was a dynamic rather than static entity.

Points that with Caste based politics we have a race to backwardness to the bottom of the pit to be the most depressed weak caste

Makes a plea against regurgitating cliches on Caste prejudices that have been internalised in Indian public discourse

What are the most important legitimate and serious criticisms of the BJP

1. We have to find a way of relating advancement within the party to performance. Confident that its how things will evolve in the future

2. There has to be an Institutionalized and Objective framework for leadership to evaluate performance

3. Greater clarity on Economic Issues. In Mr. Vajpayee’s Cabinet many leaders mutated into Nehruvian Statists. There has to be a deeper reflection and study of Economic issues. All debate is reduced to one-liners. There has to be deep study and deeper reflection to arrive at a considered view rather than reduce to evening news headlines.

4. Stop reacting to what Governments are doing. Stop reducing all politics to merely agitations on people’s problems. We have to convince people about solutions. We have to convince people we have better ideas and better credibility on execution.

5. On BJP being inclusive it should be a True Secular Party and not one that appeases Muslims. BJP should have a pan-India ideology and appeal that doesnt exclude anyone

For those who are less familiar with Indian politics, explain what Hindutva means in terms of Hindu religion

That question is best addressed to those who use the word Hindutva and like to describe themselves as Hindu Nationalists, I dont know.

As a word everybody keeps using it but I have not got a coherent reply on what it means, even Islam is a way of life.

Is there anything special about Hindutva and BJP

BJP has essentially taken up issues on rebound.

BJP has been unique in taking up issues that were peddled in the name of Muslims if not actually in their interests

Bending to religious fundamentalists like Bhindranwale

More specifically on Congress bending to pressures from those claim to speak on behalf of religions

It was these issues that got BJP the label

I still maintain these are not primary ways to convince voters

BJP has to convince voters by delivering on Governance – superior policies and implementation

Who is most responsible for rot in BJP ?

Those outside BJP who use these characterisations, those who drifted state policy towards appeasing groups

Several of the Hindu values not very different from buddhist values were evident in the personal lives of RSS leaders, previous generation BJP leaders – austerity, pride in native traditions, and its relevance, are no longer evident in BJP

On changing levels of tolerance and openness in Indian Society – Mangalore pub incident, cases against M.F. Hussain, Raj Thackeray etc.. was India more tolerant in 1960s 1970s than now

India is an ocean, these incidents are deplorable they have nothing to do with religion or tradition, these are fringe individuals and groups

Mangalore incident was stage managed. Ready presence of TV camera crews at the site of incident is a give away.

On MF Hussain absolutely no justification whatsoever for him to be in exile for him to be berated or attacked

How is it that MF Hussain that with his great skill has never felt an urge to paint the face of the Muslim Prophet but has always found the inspiration to paint Indian Gods without any hesitation ?

It is a double standard, it  reflects the selective way in which critics on both sides frame issues draws attention to paintings showing Sita deriving erotic pleasure from Hanuman’s tail while no paintings on Prophet’s wives

On vegetarianism and buildings brilliant Market based solution – let us build more buildings so there are many alternatives and those who are exclusionary are passed over

On Narendra Modi – should he be projected as a future Prime Minister or should that be off the table to build a winning BJP

1. This is a question that requires an extended answer

2. We should not underwhelm or trivialize his Development track record and on Governance

3. His work on development is exemplary

4. When he brings water to Kutch or Saurashtra its not that water is only to Hindus and discriminating against Muslims same goes for fruits of development from Roads and Power. Why dont we see that track record  ?

5. His critics have made him a national figure today. I personally saw this.

6. One day I was travelling from Delhi to Manipal in Karnataka. It happened by coincidence when assembly election results from Gujarat came out. I was in the Plane and I was working the election was out of my mind. In the middle of the plane the Air Hostess comes to tell me that the Captain sends you a message that Narendra Modi is doing well in Gujarat. In the airport the porters came to congratulate that Modi was winning. Many hours later in Mumbai people in the airport came to me to congratulate. The baggage handlers in Mangalore airport embraced me when Modi’s tally in Gujarat crossed 121 seats.

7. Can he be the future of the winning party – he will immediately electrify the party if he comes to Delhi but there will also be deep divisions in the country. He will have to overcome those divisions if he has to make it a winning Party. But no doubt he will immideately electrify the Party.

We should not under-estimate his potential to be elected to High Office if the current trend of religion based entitlements continues

Open House questions followed.

What should BJP’s future economic policies be  India versus Bharat ?

Yashwant Sinha gave a very good answer to this.

How is it that in Punjab those economic reforms got the BJP seats but in Haruyana BJP got wiped out. That they lost in Maharashtra gained in Gujarat. Lost in Andhra won in Karnataka.

The cliche of India Shining versus Aam Admi is a media inspired cliche

Tail Piece:

humpty-dumpty


Indian Secularism is Sick

October 19, 2009

Congress I (islami-isai) supported by communist elements have foisted an ugly perversion of secularism on native Indians.

Secularism in the West was conceived to keep in check totalitarian dogmatic church, a known institution of deceit and perversion. Since Islam too is dogmatic and totalitarian, Secularism in India would have made sense if it helps keep these beliefs under check.

On account of perversion by Congress I (islami-isai) and communists, secularism was used to undermine native Hinduism, a decentralised faith, a faith where experience is central, skepticism is integral, belief voluntary and text subservient. Foreign concept of secularism makes sense, only if it is applied on dogmatic foreign beliefs, which it was created to keep in check – Beliefs like xianity, islam.

Articles 25 to 30 of India constitution have been used to empower totalitarian xianity/islam. In India, we have a situation wherein all the rights, privileges and prerogatives belong to the minorities and the native Indians are left holding the duties, responsibilities and obligations.

Natives as we know in India cant set up education institutions to propagate their values/heritage. And native places of worship alone get regulated by the hostile government, their resources abused/looted.

All this happens while followers of totalitarian dogmas propagate their hateful beliefs unrestrained and actively encouraged by government and corrupt media. Further islamic and christian groups are networked with global networks, which support their co-religious groups in India with cash and kind. Apart from subverting harmony in India, many of the global networks fester hate towards native ethos.

In India’s perverse electoral environment native icons/beliefs can be abused without any costs while totalitarian beliefs and their idols get nothing but eulogies. And the forced eulogy of totalitarian beliefs are underwritten by violence. All hell breaks lose when xian/muslim idols like jesus/koran get are critically examined.

Moral equivalence between  Native Indian Hinduism, a decentralised faith, a faith where experience is central, skepticism is integral, belief voluntary and text subservient and dogmatic totalitarian foreign beliefs like islam and christianity remains an egregious error. Islam and christianity remain beliefs pushing its followers towards medieval dark ages and barbarianism. This perversion of secularism can be rightly called as sickularism.

One such example of this perversion is presented below as a Congress candidate argues Hinduon Ka Shahr Se Naamon Nishaan Mitaanaa Hai:

T_SUN06 congress is islami isai

Congress leader Syed Abdul Quadir Amir (Quadir Maulana) candidate for Aurangabad during elections, extorts that native Indians/their parties should be obliterated and Aurangabad islamised. When caught in their overt hate acts, sickulars revert with convenient denials. Sickos and their isai/islami collaborators have perpetrated hate similar to what is captured above, both covertly and overtly, for far too long, tearing the national fabric. Fundamental islamic/isai  hostility to native weltanschuang is a persisting reality. For well being of all Indians, constitutional safeguards to stop the intolerance of totalitarian  hate mongering beliefs – islam, xianity are essential.

Native Indians have been historically naive and charitable towards followers foreign totalitarian beliefs that seek to uproot native Indian heritage and culture using all possible means. It is time to call their bluff.

Related:


Arunachal Pradesh – Chinese Checkers

October 15, 2009

What is cooking in Arunachal Pradesh? Recent census in China daily shows 96% chinese protest Indian PM visiting Arunachal Pradesh.

Typical of communist totalitarian creed, Chinese communists were/are as deceitful as Indian ones, if not more. The People’s Daily, a newspaper run by the Communist Party’s propaganda wing, articulating the party’s positions on foreign affairs,  alluded to India’s relationship with the United States, and said India followed a policy of “befriending the far and attacking the near.” This when China’s policy for the past 37 years has been to ally with the US and undermining its neighbours.

And it is china which has sought to undermine India by encirculating it, nuclear arming Pakistan. It deployed its strategic asset, Communist Party of India -Marxist (CPI-M), a party with traiterous legacy to enable (a) Maoist takeover of Nepal (b)  undermining defence buildups (c) India being leveraged for neo-colonial relationship (take in raw materials from India, export manufactured goods).

China’s occupation of Tibet was both illegal and imperialist. Tibetan natives are not chinese in any sense of the term. Tibetans are racially different from Chinese. Their language, culture, land, beliefs all are different. Tibetan script is similar to native Indian script and is very different from mandarin. Chinese imperialism and hypocrisy can be gauged from the fact that while China has provided autonomy to chinese majority HongKong, it refuses to do so to occupied Tibet.

Once china incorporated Tibet by force and illegally settled in han people at Tibet, and sought to squash Tibetan culture, leader of Tibetans took refuge in India.

Arunachal Pradesh is culturally Tibetan. China’s game is to wear Tibetan cause out by waiting for Dalai Lama to attain Samadhi so that it can appoint puppet Dalai Lama. China is also targeting to invade/occupy Arunachal pradesh so that it can complete subjugation of native Tibetans.

Dalai Lama’s visit to Arunachal Pradesh is what is riling down China. Dalai Lama’s visit to Arunachal Pradesh asserts existence of Free Tibet where Dalai Lama’s clout and prestige still count. That coupled with the anointment of next Dalai Lama from Indian part of Free Tibet, will ensure Tibetan live to fight for their freedom another day.

We know that India’s third rate abomination and infamy Jawaharlal Nehru sold out Tibetan interests by enabling China’s illegal occupation of Tibet, World’s largest imperialist land grab in 20th century. India should not sell out the interests of Tibetans and must insist both publically and in private that China is dutybound to provide in the minimum genuine autonomy for Tibetans and maintain Tibet’s identity. It should ensure that Tibetan independent cause remains alive and that the cause transcends present Dalai Lama. Both morally and from the realpolik position, this is sensible for India.

Now, let us see what many native Indians think about China.